Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug: logto/rn is not compatible with latest expo version #5890

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
JakimLi opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by logto-io/react-native#25
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

bug: logto/rn is not compatible with latest expo version #5890

JakimLi opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by logto-io/react-native#25
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@JakimLi
Copy link

JakimLi commented May 17, 2024

Describe the bug

npm error code ERESOLVE
npm error ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree
npm error
npm error While resolving: mstore_mobile@1.0.0
npm error Found: expo-web-browser@13.0.3
npm error node_modules/expo-web-browser
npm error expo-web-browser@"~13.0.3" from the root project
npm error
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer expo-web-browser@"^12.8.2" from @logto/rn@0.1.0
npm error node_modules/@logto/rn
npm error @logto/rn@"*" from the root project

Expected behavior

Expected to has no error .

How to reproduce?

  1. npx create-expo-app@latest
  2. npm i @logto/rn

Context

React native with Expo and expo dev client. with Container on my local machine

  • Logto Cloud
  • Self-hosted, Logto version =
    • Container (Docker image)
    • Raw Node.js
@JakimLi JakimLi added the bug Something isn't working label May 17, 2024
@xiaoyijun
Copy link
Contributor

@gao-sun would you like to take a look?

@gao-sun
Copy link
Member

gao-sun commented May 20, 2024

opened a pull (the linked item above) for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants