Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deniability #53

Open
cryptal opened this issue May 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Deniability #53

cryptal opened this issue May 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@cryptal
Copy link

cryptal commented May 14, 2019

I've just learned about Deniability via Eric Wall's post. It seems relatively simple to implement but I'm far from a crypto expert.

“Deniability” is a very simple and very old idea, that many people bring up from time to time. It does nothing “new”, it is merely a collection of “wallet-side” tools to make the shuffling process easier (ie, less labor-intensive, and with less potential for error).

I believe that it is profoundly under-appreciated. It is very effective and very easy, and painless to implement.

If so easy and useful, why don’t have it already?

Well, it is probably due to two stigmas: [1] the sigma of “wasting” block space4; and [2] the stigma of working on a privacy technology that is non-mathematically impressive and ostensibly uncreative.

Can Wasabi Wallet consider implementing this feature in addition to CoinJoin? From what I understand, deniability doesn't require other users, and it would be faster.

@nopara73 nopara73 transferred this issue from WalletWasabi/WalletWasabi May 14, 2019
@nopara73 nopara73 added the ideas label May 14, 2019
@nopara73
Copy link
Contributor

It's an interesting idea and I think it's worth exploring. After first read, I'm afraid its benefits aren't substantial enough to survive a high-fee environment, which we're inevitably heading towards, but I wouldn't write it down just yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants