Did you reproduce the result that was reported in the original paper?

[Noahsark]

Hi Nikolai,

Did you reproduce the result that was reported in the original paper? May I ask the exact parameters?

Best Regards,
Li

[yiyang92]

Hi Li, I still have some problems with fine-tuning so still cannot get the same results as in the paper, but inserting cluster vectors + using GMM prior certainly gives better result, comparing to baseline. Though, I hope to made fine-tune work and compare. Best regards, Nikolai.

…

On 26 Mar 2018, at 5:17 AM, Li REN ***@***.***> wrote: Hi Nikolai, Did you reproduce the result that was reported in the original paper? May I ask the exact parameters? Best Regards, Li — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQhmUwXX8dbgdyByXKq3IQu8STyzMD9lks5tiAlXgaJpZM4S6T4g>.

[Noahsark]

Thanks for the response.

By the way, the Zhusuan was updated I believe and some of your code is no longer compatible. Could you please make an update or share the workable Zhusuan that you are using?

Thank you so much.

[yiyang92]

Hi Li, Wow, thats interesting. I`m using zhusuan 0.3.0 and it apparently was updated recently so it doesnt work. I will try myself later and coorect it or just note to install 0.3.0 version in readme. I will commit some update with a bit improve fine-tuning soon, but I want to make sure that it works really better. Best regards, Nikolai

…

On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:05 AM, Li REN ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for the response. By the way, the Zhusuan was updated I believe and some of your code is no longer compatible. Could you please make an update or share the workable Zhusuan that you are using? Thank you so much. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQhmU_wLlupN3f1T6zTMeXrpjIPisUyvks5tiE0CgaJpZM4S6T4g>.

[njucckevin]

Hello.
Have you try to reproduce the CVAE baseline? In my experiment, this vanilla CVAE (means a N(0,1) prior distribution) could achieve much better result than he reported, by simply tuning the parameter (the ratio between two losses).
Thank you very much!