Drop LLVM #916
Closed
Drop LLVM #916
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mold stopped working?
You mostly notice see the difference with incremental builds.
Not that I would know |
No i meant that I tried to make mold work with gcc
I really don't but I must be missing something. How can I trigger it? I'll do some benchmarks with/without Mold |
|
On my machine, I get the following results: A big difference in relative numbers, but both compile times are very acceptable. |
Hofer-Julian
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #611
I tried to make mold work with gcc with
-C link-arg=-fuse-ld=mold -C link-arg=-B=/usr/lib/sdk/rust-stable/but it resulted innote: collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld'Anyway, I can't see a difference with our without Mold - could it be the gnu linker is substantially faster now?
@Hofer-Julian wdyt?