Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RAW 4.0 format #28

Open
MarcoVando opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

RAW 4.0 format #28

MarcoVando opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@MarcoVando
Copy link

Is raw4.0 format from Bruker compatible?
Even Fitxyk is not able to display some new .raw files

@MarcoVando
Copy link
Author

It seems that when .raw files are generated through jobs in XRDCommander (bruker) they have RAW4.0 format which cannot be read by fityk (and so xyconvert)
If instead pattern are collected with the main window of xrdcommander they have RAW1.0 format
Is it a known problem?
Below the headings of raw files opened with a text editor:

RAW4.00 ïÿ 04/10/2023 12:31:45 � � � 3C C�

  •   CREATOR                 XRDWizard
    
  •   CREATOR_VERSION         V2.9.0.22
    
  •   WIZARD_VERSION          V2.9.0.22
    
  •   WIZARD_ADDINS           V2.9.0.22
    

' WIZARD_DOCTYPE XRD
$ COMMENT � ˆ �� � �' úC ½ €? @ áz¼@=
#A @ ^¢zk`«ø?J{ƒ/L¦ø? OäIÒµø?Ød�zˆFö? à? Cu A
, OSUSER XRD User
( USER User
5 SITE Cambridge MA, USA
3 SAMPLEID MV1-84_7-40_01s  |� |� � �' �� � Locked Coupled

RAW1.01 � � 01/26/23 15:28:07 User Cambridge MA, USA 152HIJK_NiL4_std_KLM_230124 � �' zC €? � áz¼@=

@wojdyr
Copy link
Owner

wojdyr commented May 18, 2023

Support for RAW 4.0 was contributed in #23
but it's been a long time since the last release of xylib (and fityk), so the released versions don't support 4.0 yet.

@MarcoVando
Copy link
Author

I see
thank you
Are you planning to fix this thing?

@Takaogahara
Copy link

any updates on this issue?

@MarcoVando
Copy link
Author

Also interested in this feature

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants