Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing assumptions #432

Open
SerVB opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #500
Open

Missing assumptions #432

SerVB opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #500

Comments

@SerVB
Copy link

SerVB commented Dec 2, 2022

Hi! I'm comparing assertk to assertj and bumped into innability to find assumptions (assumeThat).

Do they exist or are they not yet implemented?

IMO those are quite useful, and should be provided ootb.

@JakeWharton
Copy link
Contributor

Assumptions do not work in multiplatform, so this would have to be a JVM-only feature.

evant added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on
junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4)

Fixes #432
evant added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on
junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4)

Fixes #432
evant added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on
junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4)

Fixes #432
evant added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on
junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4)

Fixes #432
evant added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
jvm only, uses open4j's TestAbortedException under the hood so works on
junit5 or other compatible testing framework (does not work on junit4)

Fixes #432
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants