-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It doesn't respect the order under group #17
Comments
Hi! So, currently, ordering within a subgroup is not enforced. In your example, Since you do not have the It sounds like you think the order of the items in a subgroup should be enforced? Hmm, I can see the value in that... I personally prefer to sort alphabetically for all groups. I'm on the fence. Any additional arguments for/against it? |
In the beginning I though the behavior of In my case, alphabetically sort doesn't solve the problem
In other case, it might be sort by string length 🤷♂ and lead me to think is there any possibility to allow custom sort function as an item under
|
Good idea but sometimes is not necessary. I suppose that beyond it this rule should support an Object like this: "groups": [
{
"group": [
"some_same_values_here"
],
"order": "asc|desc|asc-by-type|desc-by-type" // default is alphabetize.order
}
] |
any update on this @Tibfib ? |
Lets say I have this configuration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: