Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

analysis of multiple time points * 2 replicates of scRNA-seq #138

Open
tanasa opened this issue Jan 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

analysis of multiple time points * 2 replicates of scRNA-seq #138

tanasa opened this issue Jan 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@tanasa
Copy link

tanasa commented Jan 26, 2020

Dear all,

'd appreciate having your suggestions on the following case of scRNAseq analysis with LIGER /Seurat 3.1. ; the question is : what analysis strategy would you recommend (described below) ?

shall we have 4 batches of scRNA-seq data of these experiments :

WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2

WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4

what is the optimal way to analyze the data-sets ? Several analysis strategies are possible :

STRATEGY A.

  1. to use CELLRANGER AGGR (with NORMALIZATION = TRUE) on :

WT_batch1, WT_batch2 : to produce WT_batch_1_2

A_batch1, A_batch2 : to produce A_batch_1_2

WT_batch3, WT_batch4 : to produce WT_batch_3_4

B_batch3, B_batch4 : to produce B_batch_3_4

  1. and to follow the descriptions of SEURAT pipelines with LIGER, on WT_batch_1_2, WT_batch_3_4, A_batch_1_2, B_batch_3_4 :

https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/satijalab/seurat.wrappers/blob/master/docs/liger.html

STRATEGY B.

  1. to use SEURAT MERGE function in order to have all the raw data (WT_batch1, WT_batch2, A_batch1, A_batch2, WT_batch3, WT_batch4, B_batch3, B_batch4) in a large MATRIX

  2. could I apply LIGER on all the experiments with those 2 replicates, and afterwards, how could I call the function FindMarkers in SEURAT (FindMarkers(object, ident.1, ident.2), in order to specify the REPLICATES in ident.1 and in ident.2 ?

Any other analysis strategy ? Any suggestions, comments would be very welcome ! Thanks a lot !

bogdan

@theAeon theAeon added the question Further information is requested label Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants