Replies: 6 comments
-
|
What is your ideas and opinions? @vovikdrg @rynowak @KostaVlev @TheDarkCode @monkeywithacupcake and anybody effect by this issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What is performance impact on this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@vovikdrg I don't know and not sure how to measure it. I just realize architecturally that its doesn't sound right. Edit Come to think of it, Maybe a load stress test could answer this question. I will put it on my todo list. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
#369 PR help answer the question about Detection with/out Responsive. Thank you very much @dv00d00 for your help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Move to disccusion #476 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Final conclusion, Responsive has now been separated from Detection in 5.0 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Historically
Responsivewas a separate package that you needed to install which had dependency onDetection, then during my development upto 3.0-alpha08.Responsivewas bake intoDetectionas a basic service. If you don't want to use Responsive, 3.0-alpha03 you can disable Responsive #247 viaDetectionOptions. Another question arise now, the Session and Responsive services was still registered. Responsive require Session because it has a feature added during 3.0-alpha04 User Preference #236.Detectiononly resolve the User-Agent given from the web browser. Which is very light weight for the ASP.NET Core Web Application. WhileResponsivehas advance features, it is more intensive. If you don't need, and only needDetection.Responsiveservice and its dependency are still loaded into the application memory at runtime, even its was disabled via the option.Another issue with
Responsivethat isSessionwould create a Cookie on the client web browser. Its would cause GDPR concern if it effect you or want to avoid the issue. Reference GDPR which I don't have time to look into myself. If GDPR also include identifying the web visitor via User-Agent thenDetectionis effected. Therefore,Responsivewould be subjected GDPR by its require dependency. Make this issueResponsiveonly a software architecture concern.Therefore, the question is that
Responsiveservice should included when youservices.AddDetection()orResponsiveshould be manually added viaservices.AddResponsive()? This is whileResponsiveis still in the same library package.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions