Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AI to WallaBag :) #7453

Closed
YouveGotMeowxy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Add AI to WallaBag :) #7453

YouveGotMeowxy opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@YouveGotMeowxy
Copy link

YouveGotMeowxy commented Apr 26, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Not a problem so much as a really nice advancement for the app.

Describe the solution you'd like

Imagine adding AI for things like the page summary when adding a new URL to Wallabag?

and/or

Having AI auto suggest super-relevant tags to add to the new (or even when editing) link?

Ideas could be, in settings to allow user to prefer the AI versions over the current summary fetching scheme, always with the option to select either the AI choice or regular.

For tags, the AI tags could be noted when adding, such as "ai: ", or ":", or just perhaps a different CSS color background to denote an AI tag., and so forth.

The same can be added to the Wallabagger Browser extension, as well.

Describe alternatives you've considered

None others available, afaik.

Additional context

I know it's probably pretty ambitious for such a small and busy dev team, but we're living in a quickly-growing AI era, and imagine how nice, and modern it would be to add? :)

@nicosomb
Copy link
Member

https://wallabag.org/news/wallabag-wont-accept-pr-feature-request/

@YouveGotMeowxy
Copy link
Author

YouveGotMeowxy commented May 21, 2024

Wow, didn't realize I would get such a negative reaction to what seems like an excellent idea to me.

Personally speaking, I really think you're limiting WallaBag by standing steadfast in your own, original vision, and not allowing the app to grow and evolve into something much bigger, and more diverse as to how individual users would like to customize it to their own needs. i.e. you only want to Archive old articles (there's already Archive.org for that; which brings a new idea; add a link in every article pointing to the archive.org page for it.), but other's may want to use it as a robust bookmark manager, complete with their own tweaked summaries, and so on.

Suggesting relevant tags doesn't seem so far fetched either, to me.

I'm a big fan of "options"; let the user choose how they like their app to work. i.e. a setting in options to stick with "archive mode", or "AI summary" mode.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants