You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following a fastdup run with a lower threshold, the summary screen lists counts and percentages that are inconsistent with the number of images, and refer to the number of edges. Also, counts and percentages don't align.
2023-02-19 09:54:00 [INFO] Found total 13394 images to run onimated: 0 Minutes 0 Features
2023-02-19 09:54:02 [INFO] 1752) Finished write_index() NN model
2023-02-19 09:54:02 [INFO] Stored nn model index file fastdup_imagenette/nnf.index
2023-02-19 09:54:03 [INFO] Total time took 19716 ms
2023-02-19 09:54:03 [INFO] Found a total of 0 fully identical images (d>0.990), which are 0.00 %
2023-02-19 09:54:03 [INFO] Found a total of 0 nearly identical images(d>0.980), which are 0.00 %
2023-02-19 09:54:03 [INFO] Found a total of 1189 above threshold images (d>0.900), which are 2.96 %
2023-02-19 09:54:03 [INFO] Found a total of 1339 outlier images (d<0.050), which are 3.33 %
Here, for outliers, 1,339 outliers are ~10% of the data if are all images. if 3.33% are outliers, count should be 442 images.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's bizarre seeing counts that are higher than the number of images
2023-04-12 10:39:26 [INFO] Found total 5278 images to run ontimated: 0 Minutes 0 Features
...
2023-04-12 10:39:27 [INFO] Found a total of 8271 above threshold images (d>0.900), which are 52.24 %
What I would expect is that there's a hierarchy of types of similarity, so the images get binned into being fully identical or nearly identical or similar or outlier. If an image is fully identical with any other image then it's classed as fully identical, even if it is also nearly identical or similar to other images.
Following a fastdup run with a lower threshold, the summary screen lists counts and percentages that are inconsistent with the number of images, and refer to the number of edges. Also, counts and percentages don't align.
Here, for outliers, 1,339 outliers are ~10% of the data if are all images. if 3.33% are outliers, count should be 442 images.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: