Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 29, 2022. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
267 lines (184 loc) · 8.57 KB

HACKING.rst

File metadata and controls

267 lines (184 loc) · 8.57 KB

How to hack on HTTPolice

Development environment

Set up:

$ python3 -m venv /path/to/env
$ . /path/to/env/bin/activate
$ pip install -e .
$ pip install -r tools/requirements.txt
$ pip install ...    # any extra tools you like to have

Run tests:

$ pytest

Run Pylint:

$ pylint *.py **/*.py

The delivery pipeline (Travis CI) enforces various other checks; if you want to run them locally before pushing to GitHub, see .travis.yml.

Versions of development tools (pytest, Pylint...) are pinned down to help make builds/QA reproducible. From time to time, they are manually upgraded (see the "Maintenance" section).

Codebase overview and caveats

Rules and magic

At the core of HTTPolice are four long functions:

  • httpolice.message.check_message
  • httpolice.request.check_request
  • httpolice.response.check_response_itself
  • httpolice.response.check_response_in_context

Code in these functions looks a bit like rules in an expert system. Most of these rules are ad-hoc (corresponding directly to text in the RFCs), self-explanatory (by reference to the notice IDs they produce), and independent of each other. There is no need to split them into smaller functions.

The important thing about these rules is that they utilize a rich domain model defined mostly in httpolice.structure and httpolice.headers. This provides magic, such as in Parametrized and HeaderView, that makes the rules look very natural and easy to follow. However, you have to know and keep in mind how this magic actually works, otherwise it's easy to introduce bugs.

None and Unavailable

Many things in the domain model can be None or instances of httpolice.structure.Unavailable in addition to the normal range of their types. Typically:

  • None means "we have no information about this thing";
  • Unavailable means "we know that this thing is present (not missing), but we don't know its exact value in this context".

For example:

  • httpolice.Message.body can be:
    • a non-empty bytestring;
    • an empty bytestring, meaning that the body was absent or empty (RFC 7230 distinguishes between absent and empty, but we don't);
    • Unavailable(), meaning that the body was present but unknown (for instance, HAR files never contain the raw payload body, only the Message.decoded_body);
    • None, meaning that we have no idea if there was or wasn't a body.
  • httpolice.known.method.is_idempotent can return:

    • True, which means "definitely is";
    • False, which means "definitely is not";
    • None, which means "don't know"

    (this is why you see comparisons to False all over the place).

Known

The httpolice.known package manages tabular data associated with various protocol elements, such as which RFC defines which header.

The data is stored as CSV within the package. From time to time, it is manually synchronized with IANA registries using the tools/iana.py script, which takes care not to touch our private fields. See httpolice/known/README.rst for more.

Then, the various objects and functions in httpolice.known allow querying this data. For this purpose, the module is imported as from httpolice import known, so you get things like known.header.is_deprecated(...).

As a bonus, httpolice.known exposes nice attribute-style accessors for all the various protocol element names, like m.GET and h.last_modified.

Code coverage

The delivery pipeline (Travis CI) requires "100%" statement coverage in tests. This is not meant to enforce that every line has been tested, but rather to ensure that no line has been forgotten. Feel free to add pragma: no cover to code that would be hard to cover with a natural, functional test.

Use pytest --no-cov to skip coverage checks when iterating on some code.

Typical workflows

Handling a new header

Let's say RFC 9999 defines a new header called Foo-Bar, and you want HTTPolice to understand it.

  1. Read RFC 9999.
  2. Check for any updates and errata to RFC 9999 (these are shown at the top of the page if you're using the HTML viewer at tools.ietf.org). Note that not all errata are relevant: some may have been "rejected".
  3. Rewrite the ABNF rules for Foo-Bar from RFC 9999 into a new module httpolice.syntax.rfc9999, using the parser combinators from httpolice.parse. Consult other modules in httpolice.syntax to get the hang of it.
  4. Fill out the entry for Foo-Bar in httpolice/known/header.csv. Consult README.rst there.
  5. Some complex headers may need special-casing in httpolice.header. See CacheControlView for an example.

All the basic checks for this header (no. 1000, 1063, etc.) should now work.

Adding a notice

  1. Write your notice at the end of httpolice/notices.xml. Let's say the last notice in HTTPolice has an ID of 1678, so your new notice becomes 1679.
  2. In test/combined_data/, copy simple_ok to 1679_1. For some notices, it's convenient to start with another file (like put) or use HAR files instead (test/har_data/).
  3. Change the 1679_1 file in such a way that it should trigger notice 1679.
  4. Write "1679" at the top of that file to indicate the expected outcome of this test case. In HAR files, use the _expected key instead. You can also write comments there. Consult existing files.
  5. If necessary, add more test cases: 1679_2, and so on.
  6. Run your tests and make sure they fail as expected:

    $ pytest --no-cov -k1679
  7. Write the actual checks logic. Usually it goes into one of the four big functions described above, but sometimes a better place is in httpolice.syntax (see e.g. no. 1015) or in httpolice.header (see e.g. no. 1155).
  8. Run the tests again and make sure they pass.
  9. Check the report for your test cases to make sure the explanation looks good:

    $ httpolice -i combined -o html test/combined_data/1679* >/tmp/report.html
    $ open /tmp/report.html
  10. If necessary, mention the new feature in CHANGELOG.rst under the "Unreleased" heading.

Releasing a new version

  1. Make sure that you're on master, it's clean and synced with GitHub, and that Travis is green.
  2. Sync with IANA registries, for example:

    $ tools/iana.py
    $ git difftool -d     # review for surprises
    $ git commit -am 'Sync with IANA registries'
  3. If necessary, update the version number in httpolice/__metadata__.py (e.g. 0.12.0.dev4 → 0.12.0).
  4. If releasing a "stable" version, replace the "Unreleased" heading in CHANGELOG.rst with "<version> - <release date>", e.g. "0.12.0 - 2016-08-14".
  5. Commit as necessary, for example:

    $ git commit -am 'Version 0.12.0'
  6. Apply a Git tag equal to the version number, for example:

    $ git tag -a 0.12.0 -m 'Version 0.12.0'
  7. Push master and tags:

    $ git push --tags origin master
  8. Watch as Travis builds and uploads stuff to PyPI.
  9. Check builds on Read the Docs__. For example, sometimes RtD doesn't automatically rebuild 'stable' when a new release is pushed to GitHub, so you have to go and enable it under Versions and build it.

    __ https://readthedocs.org/projects/httpolice/builds/

  10. Bump the version number in httpolice/__metadata__.py (e.g. 0.12.0 → 0.13.0.dev1).
  11. Commit and push:

    $ git commit -am 'Bump version to 0.13.0.dev1'
    $ git push

Maintenance

  • Run a fresh Travis build, look at its logs and make sure everything's right.
  • Watch for new versions of Python:
    • make sure HTTPolice works with them
    • add them to Travis config
    • update PyPI trove classifiers
  • Watch for new versions of libraries and make sure HTTPolice works with them.
  • Watch for new versions of software HTTPolice integrates with:
    • tcpflow
    • HAR exporters
      • major Web browsers
      • Fiddler
    • mitmproxy
    • Django
  • Test HTML reports in current versions of major Web browsers.
  • Watch for new RFCs and RFC errata that may affect HTTPolice rules.
  • Update development dependencies:
    1. Review and update tools/requirements.in.
    2. Pin down new versions:

      $ pip-compile --upgrade tools/requirements.in
    3. Check that everything is OK with the new versions. Maybe some Pylint overrides are no longer necessary, etc.
  • Check links in notices:

    $ linkchecker --check-extern doc/_build/notices.html