Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add greater flexibility around Editors/Publishers #34

Closed
engram-design opened this issue Oct 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Add greater flexibility around Editors/Publishers #34

engram-design opened this issue Oct 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@engram-design
Copy link
Member

Such as, having both as the same user, selecting specific recipients.

Also adding notes to editor.

@engram-design engram-design added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 10, 2018
@RobErskine
Copy link

Hey Josh. Loving this plugin, thanks for all the work on it.

Just wanted to piggyback on this ticket for a feature request/enhancement. It would be great to have more control with user groups outside of editors and publishers. It would be great to create custom roles and have content filter through a funnel, such as:

Editor -> Proofreader -> Editor
or more complex:
Copywriter -> Designer -> Proofreader -> Merchant -> Publisher

Thanks again,
Rob

@saschapi
Copy link

And one more piggyback:

Having the option to have different Groups as Editor and Publisher for different Entry types would be a big advantage. Currently this will stop us from using it.

@Alxmerino
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I would also love to piggyback on this as well!

@engram-design
Copy link
Member Author

@RobErskine This has been added in 1.5.0 in the form of Reviewers.

@saschapi @Alxmerino I'm opening a separate issue for your FR, as this one is a bit vague or just greater flexibility - see #114

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants