Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for django-nested-admin #177

Open
cinarizasyon opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for django-nested-admin #177

cinarizasyon opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@cinarizasyon
Copy link

cinarizasyon commented Oct 31, 2023

Hello,

When using django-nested-admin's nested inlines, unfoldadmin does not show inputs/forms correctly.

image

Is there any plan to fix these issues?
I think it deserves to be supported as well as django-guardian and django-simple-history because django-nested-admin is a popular extension for django-admin.

@mcosti
Copy link
Contributor

mcosti commented Nov 2, 2023

@cinarizasyon are you extending the admin classes with the relevant UnfoldAdmin models?

@cinarizasyon
Copy link
Author

@mcosti yeah, my admin classes seem like:

class BusinessAdmin(ExtraButtonsMixin, CustomModelAdmin, NestedModelAdmin):
   ....

@lukasvinclav
Copy link
Contributor

This requires custom styling and integration.

@lukasvinclav lukasvinclav added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 2, 2023
@lukasvinclav lukasvinclav added third party and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 6, 2024
@dwasyl
Copy link

dwasyl commented Jan 28, 2024

Just wanted to add a +1 here for this package. The apps I run that could most use unfold all depend on django-nested-admin for some data entry. It would be great to see the package supported, or another solution for nested inlines.

@RovshenTagangylyjov
Copy link

Will django-nested-inline support be added in near future? Or are there any workarounds?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants