Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request for V2.0 #112

Open
1 task
trummerschlunk opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
1 task

Feature Request for V2.0 #112

trummerschlunk opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@trummerschlunk
Copy link
Owner

  • true peak limiting
@magnetophon
Copy link
Collaborator

As far as I know, you cannot do true peak limiting without latency, and I thought one of the main goals was to have 0 latency.
I am very interested in making a different plugin with oversampling and lookahead, however.

@danimo
Copy link

danimo commented Jun 28, 2023

@magnetophon That's correct. Most commericial plugins have a tradeoff mode where they try to get close to TP or achiving TP by trading in zero-latency for some latency. Depending on the scenario, either might be acceptable, but a (close to TP) cutoff is a must because you need to to have a good idea about your planned headroom for further loss of headroom during lossy audio file compression (which can be >1dB, potentially causing clipping with tight peak values).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants