License: this is either not an open-source project, or the attribution clause is void #1437
Labels
documentation
Improvements or additions to the documentation
needs investigation
Needs further investigation.
Steps/code to reproduce:
Actual behavior:
Contradicting content. The license says attribution in the source, docs say backlink. So today's mention in the docs is legally not binding. The language is deceptive by says "shall", this is misinformation.
Expected behavior:
Consistency.
Solutions
I noticed this while I was benchmarking the space for candlestick libraries available for developers in mui/mui-x#10932.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: