You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is this an intended behaviour? It took me some time to figure out why future::plan(future::multisession) does not work since the documentation does not require future to be attached. I thought it was something wrong with my future.
#' It is possible to estimate models in parallel using the
#' [future](https://cran.r-project.org/package=future) package. By specifying a
#' [`future::plan()`] before estimating the models, they will be computed
#' according to that plan.
Wouldn't it be better to check if the future::plan is future::sequential when future is loaded rather than to check if it is attached? It would be nice to have the option to run it in parallel without ever putting future onto the search path.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fabletools/R/model.R
Line 100 in 9794d22
Created on 2022-06-27 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
Is this an intended behaviour? It took me some time to figure out why
future::plan(future::multisession)
does not work since the documentation does not requirefuture
to be attached. I thought it was something wrong with myfuture
.fabletools/R/model.R
Lines 27 to 30 in 9794d22
Wouldn't it be better to check if the
future::plan
isfuture::sequential
whenfuture
is loaded rather than to check if it is attached? It would be nice to have the option to run it in parallel without ever puttingfuture
onto the search path.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: