-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Favourite/Unified channels list #180
Comments
Sounds like a good idea. I would not see it exactly as favorites, but adding an option to allow the user to sort channels everywhere including out of its network tab could work pretty great for that. We're already halfway there since we can already sort channels manually in a network. |
I think something along these lines could be really useful. Since I idle in a few hundred channels, but only keep a close eye on a handful or so, it'd be really nice if I could sort those out separately. I've had a bit of a look into implementing it myself, but I'm not too familiar with node.js or the similar client-side tech at the moment. |
In |
I feel like we need to come at this properly and think about how we should deal with different ways of ordering the channels. Currently, we try and organise them alphabetically, but if someone has moved one or multiple we half-don't organise them anymore. We should probably sort this into a setting that allows someone to choose how they organise. I would suggest 2 choices. One regarding grouping, and one regarding sorting. Grouping:
Sorting:
Then we don't have the half-sorted system we currently have, and allow people to break them out of their current groupings. This would lead to simpler code and allow people to have their own sorting/grouping. Thoughts? Obviously, not all of this would happen at once. |
Would it be possible to have a Favorites list that we can be activated via a setting and when activated it can contain our favourite channels from various networks where tend to check the most?
Some people does have a lot of networks in their repository and it would be a drag to check the whole list whenever they want to check this and that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: