Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Idea] Consider drop down menu based on chip name #81

Open
arendst opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

[Idea] Consider drop down menu based on chip name #81

arendst opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arendst
Copy link

arendst commented Jan 13, 2024

With ever growing amount of supported dev boards the drop down list becomes a little unusable. Consider adding a chip field pair to the boards.json file to selectively show chip based drop down list.

A starting point could be the used names in esptool (and Tasmota ;-). For version 4.7.0 I extracted the below list:

chip_name = {
    0: "ESP8266EX"        
    1: "ESP8285H08" if max_temp else "ESP8285N08",
    2: "ESP8285H16" if max_temp else "ESP8285N16",
}
Test pattern: ESP8266 and ESP8285

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-C2",
    1: "ESP32-C2",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-C2

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-C3 (QFN32)",
    1: "ESP8685 (QFN28)",
    2: "ESP32-C3 AZ (QFN32)",
    3: "ESP8686 (QFN24)",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-C3 and ESP8685 and ESP8686

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-C6 (QFN40)",
    1: "ESP32-C6FH4 (QFN32)",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-C6

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-H2",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-H2

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-S2",
    1: "ESP32-S2FH2",
    2: "ESP32-S2FH4",
    102: "ESP32-S2FNR2",
    100: "ESP32-S2R2",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-S2

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-S3 (QFN56)",
    1: "ESP32-S3-PICO-1 (LGA56)",
}        
Test pattern: ESP32-S3

        
chip_name = {
    0: "ESP32-S0WDQ6" if single_core else "ESP32-D0WDQ6",
    1: "ESP32-S0WD" if single_core else "ESP32-D0WD",
    2: "ESP32-D2WD",
    4: "ESP32-U4WDH",
    5: "ESP32-PICO-V3" if rev3 else "ESP32-PICO-D4",
    6: "ESP32-PICO-V3-02",
    7: "ESP32-D0WDR2-V3",
}
Test pattern: If all else fails use ESP32

Going over the above list from top to bottom allows to fall back to all ESP32 boards.

@thelastoutpostworkshop thelastoutpostworkshop added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 13, 2024
@thelastoutpostworkshop
Copy link
Owner

I am willing to use standard names, where can I get them ?

@arendst
Copy link
Author

arendst commented Jan 13, 2024

The "chip_name" names as shown before are from the espressif tool esptool.

As you can see there are many different types of chips even for a simple esp32.

I suggest to use the test pattern names as "standard" per chip type.

@thelastoutpostworkshop
Copy link
Owner

That makes sense, I wonder if it is easy to find the chip used in all the boards already listed

@arendst
Copy link
Author

arendst commented Jan 13, 2024

You'll have to make some assumptions. Users will make issues if they find the chip is wrong.

From what I can see most of them are "ESP32". If you see a C3 in the name it's "ESP32-C3", S2 = "ESP32-S2", S3 = "ESP32-S3", 8266 = "ESP8266"

@thelastoutpostworkshop
Copy link
Owner

I am considering adding the options for the users to see boards in the menu by chip names or by board names (sorted and in sub level menus).
I will do this in the next major release, using vuejs and a UI Framework (like Vuetify) to make the app with a modern UI and avoid fighting with screen sizing.

@toetoast
Copy link
Contributor

Just to help out here, I can tell you that the TinyPICO V3 and TinyPICO Nano boards both use the ESP32 PICO-D4 chip.

@toetoast
Copy link
Contributor

One other additional suggestion here might be to make the drop down list Font size about half the size that it currently is, so that more boards can fit on the screen when the list is shown.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants