Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

umxGxE support ordinal #126

Open
2 tasks
tbates opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

umxGxE support ordinal #126

tbates opened this issue May 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tbates
Copy link
Owner

tbates commented May 2, 2020

  • Support the new means/covs framework for top;MZ;DZ style models.
  • Support ordinal DVs

A formula interface for specifying the means residualisation would be nice. It would support residualizing means for both twin's values of moderator, but also allow more complex formulae, such as DV ~ T1mod + T1mod^2 + T1mod^3 )

@tbates tbates self-assigned this May 2, 2020
@tbates tbates added this to TODO in incremental features via automation Jul 15, 2020
@yildirimselen
Copy link

umxGxE currently does not solve binary models. After recoding the trait as a factor variable, the error message tells me that selDV must be numeric. If I run the analysis without using the factor variable, I get a result which treats the dependent variable as a continues variable. It would be a nice addition if umxGxE supports binary traits.

@mcneale
Copy link
Collaborator

mcneale commented Aug 18, 2021

umxGxE currently does not solve binary models.
Agreed, it would be nice if it did. In the meantime, you could implement the model in OpenMx. There may be some example scripts on the Boulder workshop website. Also, see https://vipbg.vcu.edu/vipbg/Articles/BG-2009-39_NoteParaEModelBinData.pdf for special considerations with moderated binary/ordinal variables. There are classic Mx scripts in the appendix of that article, which might be a good place to start an OpenMx or umx contributed port.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants