Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Serverside Priority Sync to SVOF #652

Open
K1ngSpad3z opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Serverside Priority Sync to SVOF #652

K1ngSpad3z opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
confirmed enhancement Pull requests for enhancement or feature requests help wanted high difficulty

Comments

@K1ngSpad3z
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the priority list is only a one way sync (from svof to serverside) and this causes problems because the way svof handles its affliction cure lists is that it grabs the table size from the priority list and forces afflictions after the table size being 25 to a serverside priority of 25. This causes a lot of problems because placing everything at 25 for serverside means the curing gets handled randomly.

We need to try and figure out a way to either alter the way svo handles its priority changing and listing, or create a new script which allows us to change svof priorities on serverside on the same curing number instead of multiple lines. Some examples below

image

image

This would also allow us to implement a way to sync svof's priority list from the serverside list as well

@vadi2
Copy link
Contributor

vadi2 commented Sep 14, 2020

I'd say allowing choosing serverside prio within svof would be the easiest way, because two-way sync will become a pain in the butt fast if it picks the wrong thing by accident.

@TheLastDarkthorne
Copy link
Contributor

TheLastDarkthorne commented Sep 14, 2020

Another problem that I can think about this is that since serverside only have 25 priorities, everything that is after 25 will need to be handled by either temporarily pushing the aff above 25 or by coding a smart way to use CURING PRIOAFF to temporarily prioritize those affs above others on the list according to their priority within svo. Not sure how effective CURING PRIOAFF is really but worth trying I suppose.

@TheLastDarkthorne
Copy link
Contributor

Uh actually PRIOAFF is probably not good idea cause it will prioritize the aff above all others.

@K1ngSpad3z K1ngSpad3z added enhancement Pull requests for enhancement or feature requests and removed high priority up for grabs labels Nov 3, 2020
@K1ngSpad3z K1ngSpad3z added this to To do in Enhancements via automation Nov 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
confirmed enhancement Pull requests for enhancement or feature requests help wanted high difficulty
Projects
Enhancements
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants