Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dhcpv6-pd ERL config settings failing to apply #27

Open
mgillmann opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

dhcpv6-pd ERL config settings failing to apply #27

mgillmann opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@mgillmann
Copy link

mgillmann commented Jun 24, 2019

I believe this portion of the ERL config may be failing in the latest version:
dhcpv6-pd { pd 0 { interface eth1 { host-address ::1 prefix-id :0 service slaac } interface eth2 { host-address ::1 prefix-id :1 service slaac } interface eth2.102 { host-address ::1 prefix-id :2 service slaac } prefix-length /64 } rapid-commit enable }
I tried to manually apply these settings via the Config Tree and ran into the below Alert error message: prefix-id must be less than :: for prefix /64

I was able to apply the settings by removing the prefix id altogether, however, I won't be able to confirm a valid ipv6 address until likely tomorrow? I'm not sure how important the prefix-id is for each of the interfaces. (I apologize for the bad formatting, I'm not sure how to add new lines in the code block)

I did notice there was speculation in #24 that the prefix switched back to /56 but not sure if that is accurate or not.

@mgillmann
Copy link
Author

mgillmann commented Jun 25, 2019

I do have an IPv6 address with /64 and no prefix-ids set, however, it doesn't seem to be passing my ipv6 addresses through to my router that is in bridge mode. Switching the prefix to /56 resolved my IPv6 woes.

@quelleck
Copy link

Same for me. Once I changed the prefix to /56 I got an address right away.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants