-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Beacon chain kubernetes based multinet cluster #21
Comments
Is 2GB enough at the moment? I thought we still had resource leaks? Regarding validator count:
To understand more about those figures I recommend reading the annotated specs of:
in particular the notes around Regarding the validators per node, 64 per node is 2048ETH staked, at a $300/ETH rate that's $0.6M ($1.2M), that seemed like a healthy amount of money per node. |
Thanks @mratsim , well in terms of memory I never really saw much usage in my tests, for all clients, I suspect one of the reasons is we do not sync, all clients start together at genesis. Nice info on validators.. I suppose for our own testnet we don't need to be as strict tho? Ideally an EF testnet should follow such parameters tho I guess. |
Based on the work done here: https://github.com/eth2-clients/multinet it would be nice to open a discussion about setting up our own multinet cluster in order to execute a variety of tests in the presence of other clients.
The requirements are simple in terms of tech, just a standard kubernetes (+helm) cluster and access to it.
I personally have experience with gcloud but aws should be ok too (or azure).
The key question is how much can we spend in terms of CPU cores and memory (also storage but that's the cheap bit)?
Assuming that each node should receive at least 0.5 core and 2GB memory.
If we could have 64 cores we could run 128 nodes of 64 (could try 128 even) validators each.
That would make 4096 (8192) validators. Should we run more validators per node btw?
Any input is welcome as I don't have too much knowledge in that ratio.
cc @arnetheduck @dryajov @mratsim @stefantalpalaru
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: