You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
see also #4670
and issue for heteroscedasticity, correlation robust sandwiches.
I have again problems understanding what the cov_types in RLM actually do.
We need LATEX formulas, and get some ideas what how H1, H2, H3 differ
Salini et al have 5 cov_types in table 1.
It's for S-estimator, but locally they are the same as M-estimators
Salini, S., F. Laurini, G. Morelli, M. Riani, and A. Cerioli. 2022. “Covariance Matrices of S Robust Regression Estimators.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 92 (4): 724–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2021.1972300.
main question would be how strongly inferential statistics like cov_params are influenced by outliers in exog, when X'X is not a good estimate for (expected or limiting) normalized_cov_params or hessian. Weights in current RLM are only for outliers in endog.
But that extension requires more background in outlier robust inference.
For basic cov_type: AFAIR, HC4 has stronger correction using diag_hat_matrix, but still computes the hat_matrix in a non-robust way (i.e. similar to nonrobust standard Mahalanobis distance).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
see also #4670
and issue for heteroscedasticity, correlation robust sandwiches.
I have again problems understanding what the cov_types in RLM actually do.
We need LATEX formulas, and get some ideas what how H1, H2, H3 differ
Salini et al have 5 cov_types in table 1.
It's for S-estimator, but locally they are the same as M-estimators
Salini, S., F. Laurini, G. Morelli, M. Riani, and A. Cerioli. 2022. “Covariance Matrices of S Robust Regression Estimators.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 92 (4): 724–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2021.1972300.
main question would be how strongly inferential statistics like cov_params are influenced by outliers in exog, when X'X is not a good estimate for (expected or limiting) normalized_cov_params or hessian. Weights in current RLM are only for outliers in endog.
But that extension requires more background in outlier robust inference.
For basic cov_type: AFAIR, HC4 has stronger correction using diag_hat_matrix, but still computes the hat_matrix in a non-robust way (i.e. similar to nonrobust standard Mahalanobis distance).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: