Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review: cov_params, cov_type in RLM #9190

Open
josef-pkt opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Review: cov_params, cov_type in RLM #9190

josef-pkt opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

josef-pkt commented Mar 30, 2024

see also #4670
and issue for heteroscedasticity, correlation robust sandwiches.

I have again problems understanding what the cov_types in RLM actually do.

We need LATEX formulas, and get some ideas what how H1, H2, H3 differ

Salini et al have 5 cov_types in table 1.
It's for S-estimator, but locally they are the same as M-estimators

Salini, S., F. Laurini, G. Morelli, M. Riani, and A. Cerioli. 2022. “Covariance Matrices of S Robust Regression Estimators.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 92 (4): 724–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2021.1972300.

main question would be how strongly inferential statistics like cov_params are influenced by outliers in exog, when X'X is not a good estimate for (expected or limiting) normalized_cov_params or hessian. Weights in current RLM are only for outliers in endog.

But that extension requires more background in outlier robust inference.
For basic cov_type: AFAIR, HC4 has stronger correction using diag_hat_matrix, but still computes the hat_matrix in a non-robust way (i.e. similar to nonrobust standard Mahalanobis distance).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant