New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Splunk Operator: downscaling doesn't work #1319
Comments
i did it with workaround: |
here is correction: for turning on/off dev environment only for operational hours works well |
Hi @yaroslav-nakonechnikov, you can apply annotations to the custom resources (CRs) to prevent interference with statefulsets as long as the annotations are present. Here are the annotations for the various CR types:
I'd like to know the steps you follow when you start working directly with statefulsets. Specifically, when scaling down, we need to ensure that decommissioning is run on Splunk, which the operator handles. Can you provide more detail on what issues you're encountering with the scale-down process? Your help is much appreciated. Thank you. |
good to know about annotations. atm we are using downscaling only for saving costs on dev and we are not ready to test it with real data. |
Please select the type of request
Bug
Tell us more
Describe the request
As it was described in #1272 and after testing i can confirm, that upscaling works, but downscaling is not working.
i used that definition:
and it scaled in just fine. But when time came to downscale - it didn't worked.
last indexer was just restarting and in cluster manager it was in a loop with states: up, decomissioning.
Expected behavior
Downscale and upscale works as it is expected in kubernetes. There should be no extra logic added, which may block it.
otherwise it should be explained in documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: