Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A new parser for Dell Avamar logging #2341

Closed
RichardHEB opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 11 comments · Fixed by #2393
Closed

A new parser for Dell Avamar logging #2341

RichardHEB opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 11 comments · Fixed by #2393
Assignees

Comments

@RichardHEB
Copy link

What is the sc4s version ?
pr-2259
Is there a pcap available?
Yes
What the vendor name?
Dell
What's the product name?
Avamar
** Feature Request description: **
Need a parser created for Avamar logs
** Should it support TCP or UDP?**
UDP
** Do you want to have it for local usage or prepare a github PR? **
local and github PR

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

ikheifets-splunk commented Feb 9, 2024

Hello, @RichardHEB !

What is the sc4s version ?
pr-2259

Please use release version (for example 3.19.0 or latest), we asking customer test dev version only for test Pull Request is it working before release :)

Is there a pcap available?
Yes

Please send me on email: ikheifets@splunk.com

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, @RichardHEB !
Haven't got pcap from you!

@RichardHEB
Copy link
Author

Hi @ikheifets-splunk I had asked Andre (Splunk) to send it to you. He's had it since day one, I can email it to your Splunk email, do not want to posted open in public here. Am checking with Andre as well.

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

ikheifets-splunk commented Feb 20, 2024

thanks @RichardHEB finally received it, Andre shared with me.

@ikheifets-splunk ikheifets-splunk self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@RichardHEB
Copy link
Author

Hi Ilya, any updates on this one?

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

ikheifets-splunk commented Apr 5, 2024

Hello, @RichardHEB !
Please upgrade on our dev build to check that our parser working for you:
docker pull ghcr.io/splunk/splunk-connect-for-syslog/container3:pr-2393

We parsed your log message (I hide here sensitive data like ip, emails):

<141> Apr 05 18:19:55 MCS:BS::BACKUP::EDIT: <Code> 22555 <Type> AUDIT <Severity> PROCESS <Category> SECURITY <User> email@my.com <HwSource> amavar <Summary> Changed backup expiration. <path> /clients/Dev-Cert/Windows/test.com <createtime> 2024-02-03 02:32:09 CST <plugin> 3001 <labelnum> 388 <expiration> 2024-02-16 <requestor> <requestor domain="/" host="1.1.1.1" product="test" role="Administrator" user="email@my.com"/>

Will look at Splunk like this:
Screenshot 2024-04-05 at 18 58 47

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

ikheifets-splunk commented Apr 18, 2024

Hello, @RichardHEB !
I've got your email that is working for you and question about release. If we talking about official release 7-10 days, because we have a process of review and release.

If you need it today and don't want to wait, please embed parser that provided on PR as local parser.

For that:

  1. Use latest SC4S version (3.22.3)
  2. place parser that I mentioned here /opt/sc4s/local/config/app-parsers
  3. check that you mounting to docker container this folder /opt/sc4s/local

@RichardHEB
Copy link
Author

Ilya, we tested as instructed above and also ran a load test, everything is working as it should with the latest SC4S version 3.22.3; we put the parser in this folder: /opt/sc4s/local/config/app-parsers and our docker is mounted to /opt/sc4s/local
Let me know when it is merged with main and in the latest version. Thanks Richard

@ikheifets-splunk ikheifets-splunk linked a pull request Apr 25, 2024 that will close this issue
@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

@RichardHEB It will be released during 24h

@RichardHEB
Copy link
Author

@ikheifets-splunk Hi Ilya, any word? I still don't see it merged to main and we were hoping to deploy to cert then prod today. Thanks!

@ikheifets-splunk
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants