Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Django Schema Independence #4358

Open
acwhite211 opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #4764
Open

Django Schema Independence #4358

acwhite211 opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #4764
Assignees
Labels
1 - Request Improvements or extensions to existing behavior 2 - Database/Schema Issues that are related to the underlying database and schema python Pull requests that update Python code
Milestone

Comments

@acwhite211
Copy link
Member

Create static Django models so that the Specify 7 databases schema will no longer be reliant on the data_model.xml file from Specify 6. In addition to providing independence for future development and schema updates, having static code, not generated at runtime, will create a better development environment. This is an issue that would be best to solve before further development of the database schema

@acwhite211 acwhite211 added 1 - Request Improvements or extensions to existing behavior python Pull requests that update Python code 2 - Database/Schema Issues that are related to the underlying database and schema labels Jan 4, 2024
@acwhite211 acwhite211 added this to the 7.9.5 milestone Jan 4, 2024
@acwhite211 acwhite211 self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@melton-jason
Copy link
Contributor

The ideal implementation of this feature would also fix #2813

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 - Request Improvements or extensions to existing behavior 2 - Database/Schema Issues that are related to the underlying database and schema python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants