You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First reported by Martha Boyer:
"It appears to just grab the FILTER keyword from the image header and assign that to inst.filter, but that won’t work for images where the filter is in the pupil wheel (e.g., pupil+filter = F164N+F150W2). In this example, Webbpsf is assigning inst.filter=F150W2, but it should assign inst.filter to F164N."
Further confirm with some of the wavefront sensing observations (WL images) where the combination F212N (filter) and WLM8 (pupil) simulates the F212N filter, not the WL image
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
from Martha
"webbpsf.setup_sim_to_match_file, but it’s not working because the image headers have PUPIL = MASKBAR & webbpsf says that NIRCam doesn’t have a pupil mask called MASKBAR. Presumbly webbpsf uses MASKSWB and MASKLWB, but that’s not what’s in the image header"
First reported by Martha Boyer:
"It appears to just grab the FILTER keyword from the image header and assign that to inst.filter, but that won’t work for images where the filter is in the pupil wheel (e.g., pupil+filter = F164N+F150W2). In this example, Webbpsf is assigning inst.filter=F150W2, but it should assign inst.filter to F164N."
Further confirm with some of the wavefront sensing observations (WL images) where the combination F212N (filter) and WLM8 (pupil) simulates the F212N filter, not the WL image
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: