Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support more arches for images: linux/s390, linux/ppc64le #1668

Open
lunarwhite opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Support more arches for images: linux/s390, linux/ppc64le #1668

lunarwhite opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team

Comments

@lunarwhite
Copy link

lunarwhite commented Jan 10, 2024

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Similar to what we did for arm. Refer to issue: #285

Docs for Multi-platform images: https://docs.docker.com/build/building/multi-platform/

Why is this needed?

Currently step-ca and step-cli officially support amd64, arm64 and 386. There are quite a few platforms use non{x86, arm} arch. Like ppc64le used by IBM Power, s390x used by IBM Z.

It would be nice to officially support more arches. It will offer more choices for users and developers.

@lunarwhite lunarwhite added enhancement needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team labels Jan 10, 2024
@lunarwhite
Copy link
Author

If this request is accepted, I'd like to help with it.

@hslatman hslatman self-assigned this Jan 11, 2024
@hslatman
Copy link
Member

Hey @lunarwhite, we discussed this issue and we're open to supporting more architectures in the images we distribute.

However, before we can do so, we'll need to ascertain we can maintain these going forward. Considering these architectures may or may not do everything our CA expects, we need to review the specifics of these architectures. Ideally, we'd also want to test these with some simulated, but realistic use cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants