Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should MAG completeness be considered when running Plasflow? #32

Open
Riselya opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Should MAG completeness be considered when running Plasflow? #32

Riselya opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Riselya
Copy link

Riselya commented Jul 15, 2020

Hi there, I've been applying Plasflow to MAGs from waste water treatment samples, and it seems to be working really well! My question is more theoretical than technical - given that many of our assembled genomes have low completeness (even when they are highly abundant) is it still appropriate to include these in the pipeline? The paper excludes short sequences but doesn't mention assembly quality, and I am not sure if it should make a difference or not. If I set a threshold at 50% completeness, this excludes most of the MAGs, including some of the most abundant ones. In your study, you test Plasflow on microbial mats, for which I assume most of the assemblies would be rather incomplete. So, would it be sensible to set completeness thresholds if one wants high standards for identifying true associations, or is it irrelevant? Thanks!

@smaegol
Copy link
Owner

smaegol commented Apr 29, 2021

Hi,

sorry for the late reply. I think that MAG completeness is not as much important as the proper input sequence length. Even with little completeness, you should be able to predict its origin if it will have a proper kmer profile.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants