Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Google preferring v0.1 instead of v1.0 #1047

Open
MarkLodato opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Google preferring v0.1 instead of v1.0 #1047

MarkLodato opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
website Issues with the slsa.dev website

Comments

@MarkLodato
Copy link
Member

MarkLodato commented Apr 15, 2024

Google seems to be preferring v0.1 instead of v1.0 in many cases. For example, the top result for "SLSA requirements" is https://slsa.dev/spec/v0.1/requirements. Note that it does also return links to v1.0. Ideally we could somehow configure it so that only the v1.0 links are returned, unless you specifically search for v0.1. Probably other software projects run into similar issues.

Anyone with experience with this, your input would be valuable!

@MarkLodato MarkLodato added the website Issues with the slsa.dev website label Apr 15, 2024
@MarkLodato MarkLodato changed the title Google indexing v0.1 Google indexing v0.1 instead of v1.0 Apr 15, 2024
@MarkLodato MarkLodato changed the title Google indexing v0.1 instead of v1.0 Google preferring v0.1 instead of v1.0 Apr 15, 2024
@kpk47
Copy link
Contributor

kpk47 commented Apr 15, 2024

Maybe we update our robots.txt to prevent indexing anything other than the latest official release? It would be equally bad for the top result to be the draft of v1.1.

@haydentherapper
Copy link

A related search engine issue: Google appears to be parsing time_verified on the VSA spec and setting the article date to 1985:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
website Issues with the slsa.dev website
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants