Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Torznab API #56

Open
tylergets opened this issue Feb 1, 2017 · 13 comments
Open

Support for Torznab API #56

tylergets opened this issue Feb 1, 2017 · 13 comments

Comments

@tylergets
Copy link

It would be awesome to the support the Torznab api, as it would allow many automation tools to work with this project.

Here is documentation from Sonarr, an automation tool.
https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr/wiki/Implementing-a-Torznab-indexer

@sergiotapia
Copy link
Owner

I'd love to implement this. Thanks for the heads up!

@lukyjay
Copy link

lukyjay commented Dec 31, 2017

It has been 11 months, has there been any progress on this?

@tchoutri
Copy link
Contributor

@lukyjay no. The short-term goal is to ensure that all of the existing crawlers work properly, then I will take a look at that. I'll ping you when it's implemented.

Happy Holidays.

@tchoutri
Copy link
Contributor

tchoutri commented Jan 9, 2018

@lukyjay Implementing a Torznab API crawler would go against our "Run without ceremony" goal. This is a self-hosted service so each user would have to enter an endpoint URL and perhaps API credentials.
We currently do not have a mechanism to start/stop crawlers at runtime, so we cannot include a torznab crawler that wouldn't be bothering users who don't use it.
I'm closing this issue for now, we'll open it when it becomes technically possible to provide a Torznab crawler.

@tchoutri tchoutri closed this as completed Jan 9, 2018
@gjedeer
Copy link

gjedeer commented Jan 9, 2018

Hey @tchoutri of course as a contributor you have the deciding voice here, but I think you're misunderstanding what this ticket is about. Implementing a Torznab-compatible API means that a GET request to

https://my.magnetissimo.instance/api?t=search&cat=..,..&q=Anime+Title+123

would return an XML with search results in the already harvested magnets. It's just a different format for requesting searches. OP is not requesting that you crawl torznab-compatible services (or so I think).

@sergiotapia sergiotapia reopened this Jan 9, 2018
@sergiotapia
Copy link
Owner

Right, this we can do most definitely. It's just spitting out Torznad formatted XML.

@tchoutri
Copy link
Contributor

tchoutri commented Jan 9, 2018

Oh then it's not a problem at all. :)

@sergiotapia
Copy link
Owner

It's been a ludicrous amount of time but I'm going to tackle this tomorrow. 👿

@askiiart
Copy link
Contributor

@sergiotapia Was this finally added? If so, how can I add it to *arr? I'm just getting an error when I try to connect (I'm using http://x.x.x.x:4000/api)

@lukyjay
Copy link

lukyjay commented Apr 15, 2023

@sergiotapia Was this finally added? If so, how can I add it to *arr? I'm just getting an error when I try to connect (I'm using http://x.x.x.x:4000/api)

He said he'd make a start, not finish 🙂

@ldexterldesign
Copy link

👋

Has this task been done?: if yes then this issue can be closed

Hope this helps

Regards

@askiiart
Copy link
Contributor

@ldexterldesign I believe issue #145 was closed because it's a duplicate of this.

@ldexterldesign
Copy link

ldexterldesign commented Oct 20, 2023

BUMP

If this issue gets done then can setup prowlarr, integrate with the other *arr apps and start making use of this app 🙂

Then I would do #162

Regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants