Misc notes on paper building process.

[Carreau]

These are some misc notes on collaborating with someone to write one of the proceeding.

1. I think the rst file should be removed from the output folder after build, or renamed. Reason begin there is a non zero risk for someone to start editing the things in output/build/paper.rst, and loose work later. 😭

2. the default branch not being named main (or master), seem to be confusing.

Thanks !

[deniederhut]

the default branch not being named main (or master), seem to be confusing.

The logic there is that we have a different branch for each year of the conference, and that this keeps giant clumps of paper paraphernalia (like pngs) out of the dev, the development branch. I would be happy to chat with you about more clever ways of achieving these goals.

I think the rst file should be removed from the output folder after build, or renamed.

Yup. We do have a make clean target, but that's probably not sufficient.

[Carreau]

The logic there is that we have a different branch for each year of the conference, and that this keeps giant clumps of paper paraphernalia (like pngs) out of the dev, the development branch. I would be happy to chat with you about more clever ways of achieving these goals.

What about renaming master/main or whatever once the proceeding is published, so that at least during the submission period, it's a name that is commonly used ?

[deniederhut]

Not a bad idea -- I'll bring it up with the committee