Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ship sciview with Fiji? Or make the sciview update site stay in sync with Fiji seamlessly #520

Open
ctrueden opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
build-system Issue or PR concerns build system, dependencies, etc.
Milestone

Comments

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member

Over time there have been various issues and dependency skew with the sciview update site(s) not matching what is currently shipped on the core update sites for vanilla Fiji. E.g. #422, #392, #179. This issue intends to document what the fundamental problem is, and ways we could/should resolve it.

The sciview dependencies must stay in sync with Fiji's dependencies. That's what the pom-scijava Bill of Materials is for: keeping dependencies at consistent versions. But it only fully works if: A) sciview and fiji releases extend the same (ideally latest release) version of pom-scijava; and B) the dependency versions uploaded to the sciview and Java-8 update sites respectively align with those releases.

This has been historically tricky for a couple of reasons. We have tooling to populate a Fiji installation with a Maven coordinate including its dependencies, and upload the resulting state to an update site, but there are a couple of wrinkles:

  1. Native dependencies need to be copied to the right places (jars/<platform> or lib/<platform>);
  2. We need to take care not to shadow the versions of any core libraries—i.e., every JAR should exist either on the Java-8 site (in which case it is "core") or the sciview update site;
  3. When a core dependency such as ImgLib2 changes in a backward-incompatible manner, we need to update all downstream code to accommodate the breakage, and then synchronize releases and uploads to avoid dependency skew across update sites.

To help scenery+sciview stay in better sync with Fiji henceforth, I propose that we add sciview to Fiji, so that it comes with Fiji. No extra update site needed—it works out of the box.

Needed steps to make this happen:

  1. Get scenery and sciview (re)added to the pom-scijava BOM.
    • This is important so that other projects can depend on scenery+sciview. It will let people e.g. write plugins that use sciview more easily.
    • It would also bring us closer to including scenery and sciview in the pom-scijava "mega melt" build+tests, to validate that changes to dependencies don't break scenery+sciview; unfortunately, because the builds are Gradle-based, the mega-melt tooling is incompatible—we would need to enhance the melting-pot.sh script to know how to override dependency versions in the scenery+sciview gradle builds.
    • We also need a release of sciview, which is what the pom-scijava BOM will reference.
  2. Add sciview as a runtime dep to the sc.fiji:fiji POM file.

And I think that's it?

@kephale @skalarproduktraum If you would rather keep scenery+sciview on a separate update site, I think that would also be OK. But we would then need to address the three wrinkles mentioned above: 1) fix any bugs in populate-app.sh, 2) stop shadowing core libs, 3) update scenery+sciview synchronously with Fiji whenever core libs break things. (Though ideally, core libs would not break things in the first place...)

@ctrueden ctrueden added the build-system Issue or PR concerns build system, dependencies, etc. label Jun 19, 2023
@ctrueden ctrueden added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jun 19, 2023
@ctrueden ctrueden self-assigned this Jun 19, 2023
@kephale
Copy link
Member

kephale commented Jun 19, 2023

To help scenery+sciview stay in better sync with Fiji henceforth, I propose that we add sciview to Fiji, so that it comes with Fiji. No extra update site needed—it works out of the box.

I am comfortable with doing this now. I think we're finally ready. Thank you for the suggestion @ctrueden

@kephale
Copy link
Member

kephale commented Jul 15, 2023

Doing this would close #402

@kephale
Copy link
Member

kephale commented Jul 16, 2023

I expect that the way we handle this issue will resolve/close #374.

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member Author

I'm making progress on this. But there's one major issue I forgot about when I proposed this solution: scenery+sciview now require Java 11. So if we ship it with Fiji, we need to upgrade to Java 11, or at least somehow tolerate the scenery+sciview JARs being present at a bytecode version too new for Java 8. I have some ideas, and will keep poking at it.

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, the other issue is the Launcher. I need to make it really work with Java 11, and finally update it for all Fiji users. We'll give it another go and see who complains!

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member Author

Updating to Java 11 will also require updating the JavaFX-dependent projects. It's time to start a new Java-11-based update site, and dead-end the Java-8 one. 👍

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member Author

  1. fix any bugs in populate-app.sh,
  2. stop shadowing core libs,
  3. update scenery+sciview synchronously with Fiji whenever core libs break things.

I rewrote the populate-app logic, which is now as a Gradle task thanks to @elect86's initial prototyping; see e620414. The logic is now more robust (addressing 1), avoids shadowing core libraries (addressing 2) unless the sciview site is already shadowing them, and warns when skipping a sciview dep that's newer than what's on the core sites (helping with, but not fully addressing, 3).

Oh, the other issue is the Launcher. I need to make it really work with Java 11

I am now mostly done with a new launcher for Fiji called Jaunch. This launcher is much smarter about discovering Java installations, as well as launching Java properly across the different major Java versions. For example, it will pass the needed --add-opens arguments when the Java being launched is v9+, but not when it's Java 8.

The plan is still to start shipping sciview with Fiji, so I'll leave this issue open till we achieve that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build-system Issue or PR concerns build system, dependencies, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants