Please compile support for Scala 3.0.0

[mr-git]

No description provided.

[saeltz]

Possibly duplicate of #391.

[mccartney]

I haven't had a chance to work with Scala 3 / Dotty before. Not sure what it takes and how are we from having scapegoat support that language.

[sksamuel]

I have Scapegoat working on Scala 3 in another repo.It's early days because we have to migrate every rule to new syntax since the reflection / compiler plugin stuff has changed considerably.

@mccartney greg happy to talk to you about this.

[mccartney]

Interesting. So is the plan to have a new project / fork, or will it possible to merge and maintain one code base?

[sksamuel]

Probably possibly. Is it desirable? For avro4s I've put Scala 2.12 2.13 in maintenance and on a branch and new features will go into Scala 3.

…

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 12:50, Greg Oledzki ***@***.***> wrote: Interesting. So is the plan to have a new project / fork, or will it possible to merge and maintain one code base? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#521 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFVSGXDYYABQD4VUNHSY43TTDP5VANCNFSM45AJ2MBQ> .

[mccartney]

So based on the information above. The title doesn't do it justice as to work needed:

Please compile support for Scala 3.0.0

suggests it's about compiling/building/releasing a version. While in fact it's likely to be significant implementation effort.

[kpodsiad]

I have Scapegoat working on Scala 3 in another repo.It's early days because we have to migrate every rule to new syntax since the reflection / compiler plugin stuff has changed considerably.

@sksamuel is this available somewhere? I think it'll awesome to have even a few rules supported for Scala 3, rest of them might be added incrementally by interested people.

[kpodsiad]

@mccartney is there any ongoing effort with Scala 3 support?

[mccartney]

No. I don't think so. At least I am not aware