Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential new inspections (based on old ideas) #302

Open
mwz opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Potential new inspections (based on old ideas) #302

mwz opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@mwz
Copy link
Contributor

mwz commented Mar 12, 2020

Here's a list of not implemented inspections I removed in #281.

It would be good to review this list and prioritise based on usefulness and which ones we would like to see implemented first.

  1. AbstractTrait
  2. AbstractValueInTrait
  3. ChainedPackageClause
  4. ClassExtendsApp
  5. DefaultArgUse
  6. EqualInspection
  7. HardCodedWindowsFileSeparator
  8. HashcodeInspection
  9. MethodWithUnitReturnIsParameterless
  10. NoClone
  11. NoSuperClone
  12. OptionGetGetOrElse
  13. SetSeqToDistinctStub
  14. UnusedLocalVal
  15. UppercaseLChecker
  16. UselessObjectVisibility
  17. VarFields
  18. collections/ExistsIncompatibleType
  19. collections/FilterDotSizeComparison
  20. collections/ListTail
  21. exception/CaughtExceptionImmediatelyRethrown
  22. exception/ProhibitedExceptionThrown
  23. matching/FruitlessMatch
  24. math/IntDivisionAssignedToFloat
  25. naming/FieldNames
  26. naming/VariableNames
  27. option/InexhausticOptionMatch
  28. option/OptionComparison
  29. option/OptionHead
  30. string/NegativeStringMultiplication
  31. unneccesary/UnnecessaryCatchBlock
  32. unneccesary/UnnecessaryStoreBeforeReturn
  33. unneccesary/UnnecessarySubstring
@mccartney mccartney changed the title Potential new inspections Potential new inspections (based on old ideas) Mar 15, 2020
@xplosunn
Copy link
Contributor

I would also be up for implementing some of these. But I have no idea regarding prioritization.

@mwz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mwz commented May 18, 2020

I would also be up for implementing some of these. But I have no idea regarding prioritization.

I don't think there is any specific priority. Is there anything particular on that list that you feel strongly about?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants