Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

derive more accurate boundaries #6

Open
matthewhanson opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

derive more accurate boundaries #6

matthewhanson opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@matthewhanson
Copy link
Member

I updated the geometry boundaries to be the actual image boundaries using the image coordinate in the ANG file for collection1 data and from the WRS-2 for pre-collection data.

@vincentsarago had an idea of generating a more accurate boundary from the QA band overview file, which can be smaller than the ANG file.

@matthewhanson matthewhanson added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Jan 11, 2019
@vincentsarago
Copy link
Member

👋 @matthewhanson I've run some tests reading the Landsat QA band to derive a more accurate boundary: https://github.com/vincentsarago/landsat-footprint

Ideally we should read the full resolution or first overview but this seems to be slow thus costly (>15second). Reading the second seems to be really fast (~1second) and gives a good estimate of the boundary.

Overview level 0 1 2 3 4
HTTP call 243 34 6 5 5
Bytes transfered (Ko) 446 030 95 374 45 430 35 621 33 925

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants