Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[experiment] Explore user actions #460

Closed
wants to merge 27 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ro0gr
Copy link
Collaborator

@ro0gr ro0gr commented Oct 6, 2019

Opened this PR to share the status and bootstrap a discussion about a desirable API to define user actions.

Fixes #453


description tbd

@ro0gr ro0gr changed the title [do not merge] Implement action utility [experiment] Explore user actions Oct 29, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 29, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-1.3%) to 97.062% when pulling 54d5677 on ro0gr:user-action into f303657 on san650:master.

@ro0gr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ro0gr commented Oct 29, 2019

just re-written all the built-in actions with a new proposed run+action. It allowed to drastically cleanup execution contexts and (I believe) make actions implementation a bit more straightforward.

with this change all the execution context methods intended to manipulate with DOM elements do only accept an element instead of a combo of selector, container, options.
Which means, a single invocation of MyExecutionContext.click would only interact with a single DOM node.

@ro0gr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ro0gr commented May 9, 2020

this led me to #509

@ro0gr ro0gr closed this May 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Custom properties
2 participants