Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make SymmetricFunctions work with define_implicitly #37975

Open
1 task done
mantepse opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #37976
Open
1 task done

Make SymmetricFunctions work with define_implicitly #37975

mantepse opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #37976

Comments

@mantepse
Copy link
Collaborator

Problem Description

The following should (probably) work after #37033, but doesn't:

sage: h = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).h()
sage: L.<t, u> = LazyPowerSeriesRing(h)
sage: D = L.undefined()
sage: s1 = L.sum(lambda n: h[n]*t^(n+1)*u^(n-1), 1)
sage: L.define_implicitly([D], [u*D - u - u*s1*D - t*(D - D(t, 0))])
sage: D

This involves various shortcomings of the ring of symmetric functions, in particular, that it does not come with a fraction field, see #34347

Proposed Solution

implement the missing methods

Alternatives Considered

live without.

Additional Information

No response

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues for a bug report that matches the one I want to file, without success.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant