Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why ulm (and not mlm) for transription factor activities ? there must be some overlaps #120

Closed
Sophon-0 opened this issue May 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question User question: anything that's not obviously a bug

Comments

@Sophon-0
Copy link

Sophon-0 commented May 5, 2024

Describe your question

@Sophon-0 Sophon-0 added the question User question: anything that's not obviously a bug label May 5, 2024
@PauBadiaM PauBadiaM self-assigned this May 6, 2024
@PauBadiaM
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Sophon-0,

The problem of mlm is that whenever there is high overlap between gene sets (regulons), results are unstable, and this is something that is quite common in gene regulatory networks. Specifically for PROGENy, since the gene sets were specifically built to be as orthogonal as possible, it is not a problem to run it with mlm. Therefore, whenever you suspect that your gene sets have high overlap (you can check this by running dc.check_corr) it is advisable to use ulm. For more information check this reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question User question: anything that's not obviously a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants