New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong ARP replies on second interface #182
Comments
Hi @kvaps Guessing that an interface without an IP is confusing the Romana installer, or its possible that this is just a bug or situation Romana does not handle properely. Any chance you can put an IP on this interface to see how it behaves? @cgilmour and/or @flashvoid might have some other suggestions. |
Hi @chrismarino, thanks for quick reply, What exactly romana does with this interface, why it start doing this things? |
@kvaps I don't know exactly how this can happen. Quite strange. Probably an iptable rule that's not set/working right. When you said you cleaned up iptables, did you delete |
@chrismarino What was done after that:
And this behavor is still there after all of this actions. |
Hmmm.....way past my ability to diagnose. Need to hear back from others for more suggestions. Sorry. Send an email to info@romana.io if you want to get on Slack for lower latency replies. |
I think romana can add some hidden ip |
Thanks, I'll do this! |
I've tested debian and ubuntu with few kernels.
Steps for reproduce:
|
Hi we have problem, our nodes have two interfaces:
eno1
andeno1d1
.In simple configuration the second one is not used and have no ip-address, but it is up:
When I install romana on this machine, this interface start answers on any arp's
who-has
requests from our network, example:I'll repeat that this interface does not have any IP address at all.
But this behavior continues until I shut it down:
But even if I remove any romana containers, cleanup routes and iptables, then set this interface up, it is continue flooding our network.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: