Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Where is the normal support for your RK356x chips in kernel 6.0 and higher? (You should not buy boards based on RK chip.) #318

Open
AlekseyMamontov opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Where is the normal support for your RK356x chips in kernel 6.0 and higher? (You should not buy boards based on RK chip.) #318

AlekseyMamontov opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@AlekseyMamontov
Copy link

Where is the normal support for your RK356x chips in kernel 6.0 and higher?
A bunch of companies have released boards with your chips - but you gave up on everything.
SPI - doesn't work, etc.
There are no normal DT files.
You should not buy boards based on RK chip,

This is a lot of wasted time.
scpcom pushed a commit to scpcom/linux that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2024
@sm00th @gregkh
arm64: bpf: fix 32bit unconditional bswap
087dc50 
[ Upstream commit a51cd6bf8e10793103c5870ff9e4db295a843604 ]

In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the
generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words,
resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test:

[ 9757.262607] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.264435] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.266260] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.268000] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.269686] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS
[ 9757.271380] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times)
[ 9757.273022] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS
[ 9757.274721] test_bpf: rockchip-linux#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS

Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32.

Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@AlekseyMamontov