Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide an 'away' status for connected-but-inactive contacts #208

Open
special opened this issue Jul 6, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Provide an 'away' status for connected-but-inactive contacts #208

special opened this issue Jul 6, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@special
Copy link
Member

special commented Jul 6, 2015

A user suggests that it would be helpful to be able to set an 'away' status, so contacts would know when they shouldn't expect a response despite being connected. This could be set manually, or through some measurement of activity, but the latter would have some privacy implications.

@gabedwrds
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if we're going to end up having a panel of options that are nice-to-have but weaken privacy. Automatic away status, typing indicator, etc.

Personally, while I would like to see when there's no point trying to reach a contact (because they're AFK), I'm never-ever going to actually bother setting an away status manually. It would have to be automatic to be useful.

Also, there should be a link between this and #211.

@rburchell
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think anything that weakens privacy should be on by default, for sure. And I think that the tradeoffs for enabling any such options should be made as clear as possible before actually allowing it.

I agree with what you say about away status other than that.

@special
Copy link
Member Author

special commented Jul 14, 2015

Hmm. I think I would use a manual away status to indicate that I don't intend to respond to people, even though my ricochet client is connected. This happens fairly frequently.

I agree regarding the automatic option.

@special special removed the core label Sep 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants