You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The best fitting model in QuaSSE for my data is a modal model. However, this is an upside down bell curve where speciation rates are high at all values except for a dip of the bell curve.
Is this a statistical thing? I know that some ML optimisation methods (e.g. RPANDA), resulting values should be considered as absolute values if extinction is negative. This would make sense with my data when plotting trait values against tip-rates as estimated by the DR statistic and BAMM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The best fitting model in QuaSSE for my data is a modal model. However, this is an upside down bell curve where speciation rates are high at all values except for a dip of the bell curve.
Is this a statistical thing? I know that some ML optimisation methods (e.g. RPANDA), resulting values should be considered as absolute values if extinction is negative. This would make sense with my data when plotting trait values against tip-rates as estimated by the DR statistic and BAMM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: