Is "type" word a reserved?

[14v]

When I declare some entity with field type e.g.

@Entity
interface Foo {
  // @get:Key...

  @get:Converter(...)
  val type : Type

  enum class Type { BAR, BAZ }
}

Compilation fails with

app/build/generated/source/kapt/debug/.../data/db/FooEntity.java:195: error: type Type does not take parameters
    public static final Type<FooEntity> $TYPE = new TypeBuilder<FooEntity>(FooEntity.class, "Foo")

Then if I refactor Type to e.g. FooType and clean - build I got warning dialogs from IDEA that memory and disk changes conflicts and same error repeats.

Should type word be checked at compile time to be escaped, etc?

[npurushe]

I think in this case it's conflicting with your inner definition of Type, could be solved by fully qualifying the requery Type class

[14v]

I don't use Requery's io.requery.meta.Type manually. Tried to use full path or outer class reference of Foo.Type - error remains, extra paths are shown as redundant. Look at sample in related commit.