Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Support for Git Large File Storage #547

Open
hameno opened this issue Dec 3, 2015 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #791
Open

[Feature Request] Support for Git Large File Storage #547

hameno opened this issue Dec 3, 2015 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #791

Comments

@hameno
Copy link

hameno commented Dec 3, 2015

Our designers recently started using git for version controlling their work. But git isn't really made for large binary files and github developed an extension called LFS to improve this workflow.
Would it be possible to implement support for LFS?

@wherget
Copy link

wherget commented Mar 1, 2016

I would very much second that request, but it looks somewhat out of scope for this plugin? Git-annex (which is already supported) looks to have been much easier to integrate. Especially the git-lfs-authenticate stuff looks like it needs some additions in gitolite proper.

@n-rodriguez n-rodriguez self-assigned this May 23, 2016
@n-rodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

I would very much second that request, but it looks somewhat out of scope for this plugin? Git-annex (which is already supported) looks to have been much easier to integrate. Especially the git-lfs-authenticate stuff looks like it needs some additions in gitolite proper.

you say it best, but I keep the issue open in case someone would like to implement it.

@n-rodriguez n-rodriguez changed the title Support for Git Large File Storage [Feature Request] Support for Git Large File Storage Jan 28, 2017
@n-rodriguez n-rodriguez removed their assignment Dec 24, 2020
@trobol trobol linked a pull request Jun 7, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants