Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable Feature For Provider Repositories Which Do Not Passes The Providers Test #1090

Closed
3 tasks done
FUSIONOF opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@FUSIONOF
Copy link

Describe your suggested feature

Hey,I Want To Request You To Please Add A Feature To Disable All The Repositories By Ourselfs That Are Not Accessible To Us By Any Reasons Or They Do Not Pass The Test Of Providers Available In The App To Be Bloxked Because Then Only The Repositories That We Have Access To Will Be Loaded And It Will Result In More Data Saving+Fast Loading And No Unnecessary Processing.

Other details

No response

Acknowledgements

  • I have searched the existing issues and this is a new ticket, NOT a duplicate or related to another open issue.
  • I have written a short but informative title.
  • I will fill out all of the requested information in this form.
@FUSIONOF FUSIONOF added the enhancement New feature or request label May 14, 2024
@FUSIONOF FUSIONOF changed the title Disable Feature Of Providers Repository Which Do Not Pass The Test Disable Feature For Provider Repositories Which Do Not Passes The Test May 14, 2024
@FUSIONOF FUSIONOF changed the title Disable Feature For Provider Repositories Which Do Not Passes The Test Disable Feature For Provider Repositories Which Do Not Passes The Providers Test May 14, 2024
@int3debug
Copy link
Contributor

Provider Test is for development and not accurate
Install only plugin that you use and uninstall rest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants