Incorrect comments in some public member documentation

[lukebakken]

User @domicioam noticed the following incorrect comments in #1105:

[lukebakken]

@domicioam please understand that when we suggest opening a pull request to fix issues it is to confirm that yes, the issue is valid and that yes, we would appreciate a contribution to fix it.

[dominsights]

@domicioam please understand that when we suggest opening a pull request to fix issues it is to confirm that yes, the issue is valid and that yes, we would appreciate a contribution to fix it.

Hello Luke,

I am not sure if that was the intention. I felt like the other guy was calling me lazy for reporting it instead of fixing it. I would gladly fix the comments if I was familiar with the library, but the best I could do at the time was to report the issue.

Thanks for the heads up anyways. It is good to learn the jargon of open source projects.

Kind regards,
Dom.

[lukebakken]

I am not sure if that was the intention. I felt like the other guy was calling me lazy for reporting it instead of fixing it.

I am certain that @michaelklishin's intention is to suggest contributing to the library, not suggest anyone is lazy. The RabbitMQ core team (I'm part of it) receives many issue reports across a large number of repositories here on GitHub. A fraction of those (like yours) are legitimate and we suggest opening pull requests in case people are hesitant to do so. If an issue doesn't require a fix we say so as well.

In general, open-source project maintainers may seem abrupt with their comments but it's best to take them at face value rather than reading into them. We're all busy with our day jobs!

[michaelklishin]

@domicioam I did not imply that anyone is lazy. It's a perfectly common thing to suggest for a maintainer: if the problem is well understood, the reporter might as well submit a PR.