Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

faster travis? #107

Closed
mdsumner opened this issue Dec 10, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

faster travis? #107

mdsumner opened this issue Dec 10, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@mdsumner
Copy link
Member

I'd like to have a fast travis build that just installs everything as binary, or that builds a minimal GDAL source.

Has anyone tried that? I've tried but not been successful, is it worth sharing the attempts? It would be of interest for package developers hoping to rely on sf.

@nuest
Copy link

nuest commented Dec 10, 2016 via email

@edzer
Copy link
Member

edzer commented Dec 10, 2016

See also here. Nice to have, but I see this as a travis issue, not an sfr issue. They have a repo where you can apply for your ppa to be appended to their trusted ppa's, iirc.

@mdsumner
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks! I had no idea it was because of not being able to get the unstable binaries.

@mdsumner
Copy link
Member Author

Just FYI anyone.

I finally got this, down to about 3min with all binary installs on Ubuntu "trusty" (14.04).

https://github.com/dis-organization/depsf/blob/binary/.travis.yml

See here for shortcuts: https://github.com/ropensci/rgbif/blob/master/.travis.yml

but also see the GDAL suite for a more comprehensive overview with all kinds of builds: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal

@edzer
Copy link
Member

edzer commented Dec 29, 2016

Thanks. Regrettably, I can't get this to work with PostGIS (dependency clash), which would cause a steep drop in code coverage.

rsbivand added a commit to rsbivand/sf that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants