Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rtsweep: Automatically rotate torrents (cleanup rules) #7

Open
chros73 opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

rtsweep: Automatically rotate torrents (cleanup rules) #7

chros73 opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@chros73
Copy link
Contributor

chros73 commented May 6, 2015

Automatically rotate torrents (delete oldest ones based upon the space needed by new ones):
More info in the mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pyroscope-users/EyXqIWaWMZU

Thanks!

@pyroscope
Copy link
Owner

There's already plans for a rtsweep tool:

  • Take a prioritized list of filter conditions from config section
  • Apply repeatedly on item list that is loaded once

As explained in the thread, putting that into the queue manager as a pre-task makes a hassle-free solution (make space before start).

@pyroscope pyroscope added this to the 0.6 - 0.9.6 and beyond milestone Feb 4, 2017
@pyroscope pyroscope changed the title Feature request for Automatically rotate torrents rtsweep: Automatically rotate torrents (cleanup rules) May 25, 2017
@pyroscope pyroscope self-assigned this May 24, 2018
@pyroscope
Copy link
Owner

@robfrawley
Copy link

@pyroscope What is the general status of this and what additional aspects of the command remain to be implemented. I may have some free time to contribute to this if such help is needed and/or desired, and in such a case please be as detailed as possible in the expected specifications for the command API (or, at the very least, a high-level overview of sub-commands that require attention, as well as their purpose). Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants